Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Steven Otter - Khayelitsha uMlungu in a Township

In 1999, I had the distinct pleasure of visiting Capetown, South Africa for a five week stint.  From the safety of my classroom I enjoyed the beauty of the Table Mountain and the Harbour. Whilst there, I had the pleasure to visit various places such as V&A Waterfront, Jakkalsfontein, Saldanha, Cape of Good Hope, Cape Agulhas (where the Atlantic meets the Indian Ocean) and Khayelitsha. You must remember that this was just 5 years after historic 1994 elections that saw Nelson Mandela elected as the first black president in a 'free' South Africa. I must digress to add that I was the only other black student in my class and my visits to all these places including Khayelitsha was at the courtesy of my 'white' classmate Tim who was determined that I should have something positive to say about this great nation that had just escaped the claws of a political system that was so difficult to understand.

So when I saw this book in a bookstore thirteen years after my first visit I was evidently drawn to it.  Interestingly, on the flight from Jo'burg to Cape Town, I had sat next to the 'black' Bishop of South Africa and a 'coloured' South African now at Howard University and I took time to educate myself by discussing the continued disparities - 18 years after the fall of Apartheid - in this rich nation that reminds me, ever so often, of the mighty Tshaka Zulu.

Khayelitsha  is one of the fastest growing informal settlements in the Western Cape. It is hidden somewhere beyond the mountains where it does not 'disturb' the average visitor's view...almost as one would hide a step child.  Khaya - as it is known in short - is 99.5% black - mostly Xhosa - with the remainder of the populace being of mixed race. Now I cannot strictly tell how this came to be but there was a time when South Africa's political system was famously known for Apartheid - to be set apart - with very strict pass laws.  My 'coloured' classmate in 1999 had attempted to educate me on the 1950 race laws when people were confined to live in certain areas in accordance to their race.  He explained to me the challenge that arose when a 'coloured' child was born to a 'black' mother and 'white' father (or vice versa)...All the three had to be separated unless the child could be defined as either black or white.   Then there is the complex story of SKIN where a dark child was born to two white parents. Officials struggled to define whether this child was black, white or coloured for the purposes of where she would live & school.  There was strictly no mixing of races - and the church condoned it - but that is another topic altogether for another day.

This book is not about the sin called apartheid but the effects thereof that continue to plague an otherwise great nation.  It is the true story of Steve Otter, a white South African, who throws caution to the wind and against the advice of his kinsfolk, takes a conscious decision to live in Khayelitsha during his journalism internship.  It is an extremely interesting read because the book  - in a very unassuming and non judgemental way - educates the reader on life in Khayelitsha.  In reading the book one faces the issue of informal settlements.   I could not help but compare Khayelitsha to the Kibra Townships in Nairobi, Kenya of which a lot has been said and written. Googling Khayelitsha I got 237,000 hits as compared with 2,200,000 hits for Kibra.  The issues in the Brazilian Favelas, the Kenyan Slums, The Egyptian City of the Dead and South African Black Townships are similar.   Most of the people who stand, squat, sleep or hang around these areas pay rent and try their best to eke a living despite the extremely unfair situation that they find themselves in. The human being is resilient and those who are forced to live in these settlements make the best of their situation.  A few even thrive but this does not reduce the tragedy of that existence.  That one is forced to raise their children in such deplorable conditions - either by choice, circumstance or design - is a mockery of the vote that they carry in a democratic society and a waste of the tax they pay either directly or indirectly. 

Governments find it impossible to do anything to address urban poverty given the entrenched interests at play, interests more powerful than drug & sugar barons or other mafia.  The story of informal settlements is a complex one for which there is no easy solution.  Some settlements are better than others and Khayelitsha & Soweto cannot compare to Alexandra, Kibra & Korogocho.  The elite, rich & middle classes sleep easy and blame those who live in such abject poverty for their own plight.  They glorify, explain or ignore informal settlements without understanding the challenges of poor sanitation, lack of space, lack of basic amenities, poor security and the stigma of that post code.  These challenges are best explained by the summary on "A House For Mr Biswas" by VS Naipaul which ponders about the dishonour of one having to live and die as one had been born, unnecessary and unaccommodated.


The question I kept asking myself as I flew back home is whether I - an African - would have the courage to experiment living in the informal settlements of Kayelitsha, Alexandra, Soweto or even Kibra. As it is, a cursory visit to Korogocho, left me traumatised for weeks on end.  I also wondered what God - in his mercy - would do with the folks who write, justify and perpetuate unjust laws, aided and abetted by those who condone them.  Is there a mansion waiting in heaven or will we be forced - in the sweet by and by - to live in shacks?


5 comments:

  1. Wow! Jean what an analysis, you know I wokw up this morning feeling like a failure by looking at my situation but reading this is like a slap on my face for not being grateful for the life that I live, the not glorious, it cannot be compared to what people go through living in slams

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Em...that despondency hits us often times even when we do not ask for it. I read an article on how the challenges of poverty, social inequality and tyranny that continue to bedevil our continent are seemingly intractable. Making the world more humane & egalitarian is almost an impossibility. So we just shut our eyes to the challenges those as the bottom of the pyramid face.

      Delete
  2. Excuse my spelling mistakes, blame it on the rain

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jean sometimes I like to blame the system, maybe capitalism is too harsh a system even in the developed world, and wonder if perhaps socialism would have been better, but when I look at the old Russia, china and Tanzania, socialism rarely did any better, it was even more enslaving. Or maybe naturally, species must just compete in the natural environment where the strongest will survive and competition would be healthy. But pondering very seriously about these issues I still believe that life is a roller coaster, it may not be so hopeless in this slums for there could be a few who manage to break away from the shackles of this misery with successful stories to tell. So much changes in a generation that those in the slums today may be the powerful tomorrow because hardship teaches people hard lessons.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Em. You remember that during Dickensenian days books such as Oliver Twist & others discussed these issues. My question is how some countries have been able to overcome the challenges of informal tenements. Some post codes are of course poorer than others, but there is a basic minimum required to remove unnecessary barriers. In the developed nations, "houses not fit for habitation" are condemned by their councils who also provide affordable housing for those at the bottom of the pyramid. It doesn't mean there are no challenges but they are dealt with when they arise. One challenge that faced Los Angeles is the issue of homelessness.

    ReplyDelete